Sign Up
Already have an account?Log In
By clicking "Sign Up" you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy
- Username should be more than 3 characters.
- Username cannot start with numeric character.
- Username characters must be from {a-z,0-9}, special characters are not allowed.
- Make sure the Email is working to receive verification code & password reset link.
- Password should be more than 6 characters.
Forgot Password
Why Ethereum Lacks a DC Policy Institute Like Bitcoin and Solana
While Bitcoin and Solana have established policy institutes in Washington, D.C., to influence regulation and advocacy, Ethereum often avoids this route, as it maintains a prominent presence in conversations without additional marketing efforts. Ethereums widespread recognition and active developer community reduce the need for dedicated D.C. lobbying organizations, allowing it to operate largely through decentralized decision-making and organic advocacy. This strategic difference highlights how various blockchain projects approach advocacy and influence in policy circles; Ethereums inherent credibility and established ecosystem diminish reliance on formal institutes compared to Bitcoin and Solana, which have opted for dedicated policy groups to shape regulatory narratives. Ultimately, Ethereums approach reflects its decentralized ethos, emphasizing community-driven influence over institutional lobbying efforts.
Share
Copied